Type 1 Processor Complex

rf90951a.exe Reference Disk Type 1 Processor Complex v1.31 (zipped image)
rd9095a.exe Diagnostic Disk Type 1 - 4 Processor Complex v2.33 (zipped image)

SCSIFIX.ZIP Finally! A utility to alter the number of sectors for a SCSI drive and convert them to a 3.94 GB drive! Bob Eager, you have answered a prayer!

Upgrading the Type 1 Complex

Specifications
"G" 486SX 20 MHz
"J" 486DX 25 MHz
"K" 486DX 33 MHz
What is the Square Of Death?
   Square of Death Limits
   ECA #0530 90-0K9/95-0KD with Complex P/N 84F9356
Upgrade 486DX2 66 MHz
Upgrade 486DX 50 MHz
Info on Weitek 4167
256 KB Cache Memory Option Kit
   256K 17 ns Cache Daughtercard
   256K 15 ns Cache Daughtercard
   L2 Cache Performance
ODP vs. ODPR
System Firmware
   ROM Images
   Support for >1 GB Disks as IML Drive
   Enhanced BIOS Effects
   Upgrade EPROM Additional Capabilities
   Complex EPROM Speeds
   Am27C010 versus Am28F010
   Type 1 Complex Upgrade to "8590/95 Dual Booting Capability EPROM"
Data Buffers
CR1 Diagnostic LED

Japanese 486DX 25 MHz Complex
Japanese 486DX 33 MHz Complex


Specifications

Memory

RAM:
   Min/Max on system board: 8 / 64 MB
   PS/2 parity FPM 72-pin SIMMs, interleaved (install SIMMs in pairs)
   80 and 85 ns memory SIMMs are supported, 70 ns for optimum memory performance.

ROM:
   All expect DX2-66: 128 KB EPROM, AM27C010-155DC (32-pin DIP)
   DX2-66: 256 KB Flash ROM, AM28F010-150JC (32-pin PLCC, 12 V Vpp)

Cache:
   L1: 8 KB
   L2: optional 256 KB write-through (except "G", standard with DX-50)

Features

  • Socket for 17 ns 256 KB write-through L2 cache on J, K, and Upgrade DX2-66
  • Socket for 15 ns 256 KB write-through L2 cache on Upgrade 486DX-50
  • No Weitek 4167 coprocessor socket on later J, K, and Upgrade complexes
  • 24-bit DMA; 10-12 MHz *
  • Dual path memory design (Dual Bus Interleave).
  • 20 MB per second data transfer support (for MCA bus)

* DMA controller originally limited to 16 MB. Fixed by the last BIOS update (unknown how).

Ed. Where is the Micro Channel controller on the Type 1? Implemented using PALs and 74xx TTL chips?


"G" 486SX 20 MHz FRU P/N 92F0049 (486SX) or 92F0065 (487SX), P/N 92F1413, FCC ID ANOIBM486A20 [P]

CR1 Solder pads for LED
J1 Pads for L2 cache connector
J2 SX/DX jumper
OS1 20.0000 MHz osc
OS2 Pads for osc
U1 169-pin LIF Socket for 486SX-20
U7 57F2194 Memory Controller
U16,20 78F1659 Data Buffer (RAM)
U30 78F1659 Data Buffer (MCA)
U36 Am27C010 BIOS ROM
U38 63F7520 DMA Controller

J2 must be set to 1-2 if a 487SX processor is installed in position U1. If there isn't a 487SX in U1, the jumper must be on 2-3.

Note: When installing a CPU, align beveled corner with the beveled outline on the board.

Note: The "G" is the only Type 1 complex to lack a 160-pin L2 Cache option connector.


"J" 486DX 25 MHz FRU P/N 64F0201, P/N 84F8036 (old) or 84F9432 (old), FCC ID ANOIBM486A25

191-052 IBM PS/2 486/25 AND 486/33 PROCESSOR UPGRADE OPTIONS


CR1 Solder pads for LED
J1 Socket for 17 ns L2 cache option
OS1 25.0000 MHz osc (CPU)
OS2 20.0000 MHz osc
U1 169-pin LIF Socket for 486DX-25
U7 57F2194 Memory Controller
U8 142-pin socket, SOD, or SMD pads
U16,20 78F1659/54F2958 Data Buffer (RAM)
U30 78F1659/54F2958 Data Buffer (MCA)
U36 Am27C010 BIOS ROM
U38 90X8134 DMA Controller

J1 The 160 position connector is AMP 650756-1, dtd 9145.

U8 The "J" complex has been seen in three guises:

  • U8 present - 142-pin PGA socket for Weitek 4167; "SOD"
  • U8 absent - socket solder pads only; "SOD"
  • U8 absent - replaced by pads for PALs, delay lines, and a resistor network; "non-SOD"

"J" Variants

Looking into the functionality of a Weitek 4167 "Abacus" in the U8 position. From this VERY limited sample, it seems you need 54F2958 Data Buffer (old) in U16, 20, and 30 to support the Weitek 4167.

Special J (J with 4167 socket)
PCB 84F8036 026
Small sticker on Weitek socket "Kit 34"
Complex BIOS "IBM Confidential" U2IT16 84F9155 18 June 90
54F2958 Data Buffer (older?)

Not So Special J (4167 socket) Lorenzo Mollicone sent some pix,
84F8208 (handwritten on sticker)
BIOS 64F6032, 1990
54F2958 Data Buffer (older?)


Info on Weitek 4167

Weitek Abacus FPU by Axel Muhr
WeitekDisk.zip Test suite from Weitek (local link)

Applications that took advantage of the Weitek Abacus were scarce. AutoShade, Autodesk Renderman, 3-D Studio were the most prominent to use a Weitek coprocessor. If you happen to own one, you might actually use or at least test it... so here's the official test-suite from Weitek. It contains these tools:

  • DOS TSR to update the BIOS for Abacus support (if missing)
  • Test tool - checks for Abacus presence using INT 11h BIOS calls.
  • Diagnostic tool
  • 2 demos: Side-by-side Mandelbrot benchmark and rendering Phong shaded beach ball
  • Abacus macros for using it natively in your cool assembly code

copro16a.txt The best source of technical information about the 4167 is the highly recommended copro16a.txt by Norbert Juffa in 1994.

4167 Floating-Point Coprocessor advanced data


"K" 486DX 33 MHz FRU P/N 64F0198, P/N 92F2282 or 92F1197, FCC ID ANOIBM486A33 [P] [P] [P] [P]

190-186 IBM PERSONAL SYSTEM/2 486/33 PROCESSOR UPGRADE OPTION

CR1 Solder pads for LED
J1 Socket for 17 ns L2 cache option
OS1 33.0000 MHz osc (CPU)
OS2 20.0000 MHz osc
U1 169-pin LIF Socket for 486DX-33
U7 57F2194 Memory Controller
U8 142-pin socket, SOD, or SMD pads
U16,20 78F1659/54F2958 Data Buffer (RAM)
U30 78F1659/54F2958 Data Buffer (MCA)
U36 Am27C010 BIOS ROM
U38 90X8134 DMA Controller

U8 The "K" complex has been seen in three guises:

  • U8 present - 142-pin PGA socket for Weitek 4167; "SOD"
  • U8 absent - socket solder pads only; "SOD"
  • U8 absent - replaced by pads for PALs, delay lines, and a resistor network; "non-SOD"

"K" Variants

"Special K" (American breakfast cereal)
BIOS 84F9155 "IBM Confidential"
PCB is marked 64F5785 01 (right above U7)
54F2958 Data Buffer (older?)

Not So Special K
BIOS 84F9154 (unknown if 4167 flavored)
PCB is marked 64F5785 01
78F1659 Data Buffer

It appears they share the same PCB, one has "IBM Confidential" / 54F2958, the other 84F9154 / 78F1659 (84F9154 likely a straight 486 BIOS)

Non-SOD Ks (Nothing where U8 was, just green resist)
FRU 64F0198
PCB is 92F1186 01
BIOS is 91F9812 (NOT Dual Booting Capability EPROM)
78F1659 Data Buffer


What is the SOD?

What exactly is this "Square Of Death" (SOD)?

David Beem responds:
   The missing A1 & A2 pins make this a dead giveaway for the Weitek 4167 coprocessor. Steven Wachtel reports "memory management" problems (ECA #0530) with the SOD complex, which might make sense since the Weitek processors use high memory areas to transfer op codes. So, can a socket go in place to see if a 4167 would be functional there, or was it a dropped option? I suppose that with a couple SOD T1s (one of each of the patches talked about in this thread) & a Weitek 4167 I am one of those that could answer the question.

>Regarding the sensitivity of this complex, has anyone ever tried to swap the BIOS with another Type 1 complex that is known to work with the faster CPUs?

Despite the complexes being very similar & using the same reference disk, fundamental changes for things like the Weitek coprocessor could really mess things up. IBM would issue a whole complex if there were problems, not just a BIOS change. Other than the T4 'N' I have seen no evidence of other complex types checking things like CPUID.

SOD Limitations (from Tim Clarke)

The limitation of the 'poor DMA controller' for the Type 1 SOD board appears to be that you can't run a Cyrix/IBM 5x86 at greater that 'x2 clocking' (i.e. 50 MHz in a Type 2, 66 MHz in a Type 1) or an AMD 586 at greater than 'x3 clocking' (i.e. 75 MHz in a Type 2, 100 MHz in a Type 1). Ed. You CAN run a 486DX4-100 ODPR on a SOD. It's only a 3x multiplier.

Not having a SOD Type 2 I can't test this, but I would expect the same limits to apply. So, you should be able to run a DX2-50, DX2-ODPR (@ 50 MHz), Cyrix/IBM 5x86 (@50 MHz) or AMD 586 (@ 75 MHz) in a SOD Type 2. The 'performance' of a Cyrix/IBM 5x86 @ 'x2 clocking' and the AMD 586 @ 'x3 clocking' are *roughly* equal, although I have a preference for the Cyrix/IBM chip.

ECA #0530 90-0K9/95-0KD with Complex P/N 84F9356 (from Steven Wachtel)

These systems appear to have a memory management problem. In my environment it was seen on a Model 90 with 16 MB of RAM. The system would hang during OS2 boot or during invocation of simple processes after a basic install (such as the system editor). Symptoms at other OS2 sites would include excessive "random" trap errors. Not using DOS on these systems, I would expect the problem to surface as some indeterminate memory related failure in the E/XMS region.

During initial setup of this machine, the problem appeared as an inability to create a usable backup reference disk (if said disk was used there were always errors). On restart after the failure the machine will request to exec its own auto-reconfiguration and mark out the "bad" regions. For my situation I had the IBM CE on-site for ~6 days for two separate events. The CE changed each memory chip and riser (for the M90) multiple times and recombined them in every combination representation.

Today (11/5/91) after following his instincts and direction of the higher level support reps, he contacted them again. They asked for the part number of the CPU board, upon which rests a Gate Array based custom memory controller. He was advised that there are *known* problems with the down-rev boards in my new machines. This problem exists(ed?) on the 0KD models of the M90 and M95, and possibly (as I do not have any to verify this ) the 0JD models. IBM's second level support is apparently aware of this potential problem, but has not disseminated this to the CE level or the purchasing customer.

Problem Part Identification and Rectification

If the Processor Complex (nee-CPU board) part number is 84F9356 (or 84F anything?) on the "barcode/label" of the board you should get a replacement.

The replacement part bears the part number 92F... I do not know if this is free. Note, I have a M95 with this later board version that has never shown any of these problems.


Upgrade 486DX2 66 MHz FRU P/N 92F0145, P/N? 52G9480, FCC ID ANOIBM486B33 or ANOIBM486B66 (misprint?)

192-178 IBM PS/2 486DX2-66 PROCESSOR UPGRADE OPTION

CR1 Solder pads for LED
J1 Socket for 17 ns L2 cache option
J4 EEPROM Jumper (leave on "R")
OS1 33.3333 MHz osc (CPU)
OS2 20.0000 MHz osc
U1 169-pin LIF Socket for 486DX2-66
U8 57F2194 Memory Controller
U22,28 78F1659 Data Buffer (RAM)
U39 78F1659 Data Buffer (MCA)
U43 Am28F010 41G9374 BIOS ROM "L"
U47 Am28F010 10G4978 BIOS ROM "R"
U45 90X8134 DMA Controller

U43/47 - system firmware, 2x Am28F010. Louis found an Upg. 486DX2-66 complex with socketed U43/47. It's unknown whether the used devices are OTP ROMs or (Flash) EEPROMs. The board in question is marked as FCC ID ANOIBM486B66 - an identifier not present in the FCC database. Possibly a misprint?

J4 Once you toggle this jumper you will end up in a 0129 3000 error - "EEPROM Jumper is in the wrong position" and no boot or such. I'd reported that some time ago while testing around with the 92F0145.

The jumper selects which one of the two Flash ROM devices (banks) is active by default. The alternative setting branches into a BIOS error-code - either an abandoned feature, or the never shipped flash updates were supposed to work similar to the T4 platform - Stage 1 bank altering its position with every successful BIOS update (but here without the software-controlled bank selection to compensate for the incorrectly installed jumper).

Note: Leave J4 jumper on the center and bottom pin - "R".

Upgrade 486DX2 66 MHz Back

CR2 Schottky Diode B54 (Flash Vpp)
L1 Inductor 47 uH (Flash Vpp)
U77 LT1109-12 DC/DC Conv. (Flash Vpp)

U77, CR2, L1 (plus some other passives) are part of a local 12 V voltage generator. This additional "programming voltage" (Vpp) is required by the Flash memory to perform erase/write operations. Its general topology closely replicates the "Flash Memory VPP Generator" circuit from the LT1109 datasheet (page 1).

Peter says:
   As a follow up notice: Yes, it *has* a Flash ROM BIOS. And, yes, it comes up with the Type 1 reference disk. Even installs a reference partition as usual with these disks.

But the system permanently fails to boot into this Type 1 reference partition. Once you reboot it and press [ctrl]+[alt]+[ins] at CP 66 (cursor top / right) the machine loads the operating system instead jumping into reference.

The platform nicely takes the Kingston Turbochip *without* restoration of the system partition. Runs fine with it - right from the start.

Supports Non-IML Configurations

Dennis Smith found out that this complex can successfully boot without an IML device at ID6. He booted a SCSI drive at ID0 WITH NO IML track. I did it here with my upgrade DX2-66.

His guess was this complex was designed to support RAID Arrays, and the early RAID controller, "Passplay" had no ability to boot from an array.


Upgrade 486DX 50 MHz FRU P/N 92F0048, FCC ID ANOIBM486A50

191-096 Personal System/2 486/50 Processor Upgrade Option
52G9509 "8590/95 Dual Booting Capability EPROM" HERE

CR1 Solder pads for LED
J1 Socket for 15 ns L2 cache option
OS1 50.0000 MHz osc (CPU)
OS2 20.0000 MHz osc
U1 169-pin LIF Socket for 486DX-50
U8 57F2194 Memory Controller
U22,28 78F1659 Data Buffer (RAM)
U40 78F1659 Data Buffer (MCA)
U44 Am27C010 91F9812 BIOS ROM
U47 90X8134 DMA Controller

U44 Complex BIOS Stock version is 91F9812. This version does not fully support the F/W SCSI [Corvette] and IML from up to 3.94GB drives.

To get the most out of this complex, you need the 52G9509 "8590/95 Dual Booting Capability EPROM" -AND- the SCSI adapter needs the 92F2244 and 92F2245 SCSI BIOS Firmware. All three can Spocks, short Tribbles, and all Fast/Wide SCSI adapters come stock with the 44/45 SCSI BIOS pair.

Note: This complex needs the 15 ns cache. The other Type 1 complexes use 17 ns memory.

Some observations:
   The chipset appears the same as other Type 1s with the addition of decoding circuitry.

The Upgrade 486DX-50 is a Type 1 with true 50 MHz CPU on the complex! All Type 1 complexes [except "G"] use a 160 position 4x40 receptacle for the L2 Cache option. Having the 486DX-50 on the complex PCB instead of a daughtercard means that any upgrade CPU will NOT be getting close to a Model 90 memory riser!

Note: On the Upgrade 486DX-50, the CPU clock, OSC1, has been moved from being under the left side of U16. It is visible even with an L2 Cache option installed. OSC1 is a black SMD, so if you don't see a shiny oscillator like you are used to, look again.

Note: The Type 3 "M" complex is the only other true 486DX-50, but the "M"'s DX-50 is on the daughtercard! (M is also called the "double-decker")

Note: The Type 3 "M" complex is the "Enhanced 486/50" while the Type 1 486/50 is the "486/50 Processor Upgrade"

Identify Upgrade 486/50

I have noticed that sometimes, an older complex that was replaced is put into the box from the upgrade.

To positively identify the Upgrade 486/50, look at the back for the FCC ID sticker. It should say "FCC ID ANOIBM486A50".

What happens: A 486/33 "K" is replaced by a 486/50, the "K" is put into the box, and through no fault (it is almost 30 years old!) the complex is called a 486/50 because that's what is on the box... This happens with other adapters as well.

The 486/50 is easy to identify, the location of OS1 is to the left of other Type 1 complexes, OS1 is 50.0000 MHz, and OS1 is an SMD (black plastic). All other Type 1 complex use metal canned oscillators.

Note: The yellow component just below OS1 is "A5C 334K".

So if you want the fastest Type 1 complex, remember that Black is Beautiful!

How is this different to the other T1 boards and the T3 Enhanced complex?

From Peter:
   As far as I can tell (from the pictures of that complex) it varies through some different wiring and modified ASICs. The part of the hardware that deals with the CPU clock generation looks a bit different. The rest of the card is the "later" Non-SOD Type 1 platform as I have it here in my trusty old AKD.

It seems as if IBM wanted to offer an upgrade path to DX-50 *without* the ECC option - for those customers that have a -xKx machine already and for the Mod. 90 maybe, which does not cope with the "double-decker" DX-50 Type 3 platform very well. This board was not offered with any particular Mod. 90 / 95 right from the start. It has been an option only.

We, the god-Emperor:
   As surmised before, the T1-50 "Big 50" was released to allow 486DX-50 power without ECC support without the need for the double-deck M. I'm not so sure that is the case:

191-198 IBM PS/2 486SX/25,33,50 PROCESSOR UPGRADE OPTIONS Oct 17, 1991
192-101 IBM PS/2 ENHANCED 486/50 PROCESSOR UPGRADE OPTION Apr 28, 1992

To be clear about the improvements in the M complex:
   Enhanced dual path memory design (Dual Bus Interleave). Although Base 1 allows both the processor and busmasters to access memory concurrently through two paths, the Base 3 and 4 has buffers at both paths to provide better performance. Also the buffer on the adapter side (I/O buffer) uses packet data transfers for writes. This means 16 bytes are collected and this packet is written in one cycle to memory as opposed to writing for every 4 bytes received (as with unbuffered systems).

Tom sums things up:
   The T1 Upgrade 50 board is (obviously) just an incremental improvement of the existing T1 design. It provides higher CPU performance, and comes standard with L2 cache. But that's about it... Other than that, it's just the same "old" T1. The R&D time and costs would be relatively low with this one, so IBM would be able to push it out to the market quicker and for more accessible price (in IBM terms...).

The Enhanced T3 50 complex, on the other hand, is a drastically different beast. It brings not only a higher CPU performance, but also better system throughput, thanks to its improved design and streaming capabilities. It also comes with a 32-bit DMA controller, ECC memory support, and more. All these enhancements were of course reflected by its development time and price tag.

So, clearly what we have here are two very different designs, with different capabilities, release dates, and price points. If your server needed some more CPU headroom and it needed it now (late 91/early 92), the T1 Upgrade 50 would have been the right choice for you. If you sought after higher overall performance, or some of the new features, the Enhanced T3 platform would give you that. For extra $$$...

Lorenzo Mollicone:
   The Announcement Letter says "... an external 256KB level two cache is provided as standard on the processor complex" All of my boxed Upgrade 486DX-50 Processor Upgrade Options have the L2 Cache.


256 KB Cache Memory Option Kit 17 ns and 15 ns

Note: In a advertising/tech nugget booklet, IBM ran tests with a number of (then) current applications, and the best they could do was 6%; that is, six percent. I bet they wanted much better.

17 ns for "J" [25], "K" [33] and Upgrade 486DX2-66 [33] complexes
15 ns for Upgrade 486DX-50 [50] MHz complex

The 256 KB cache is a 5.5 x 3.0 inch card that connects to either the 25, 33 or 50 MHz complex. The connector is 160 pins arranged in four columns and 40 rows. The complex provides all the power required to drive the 256 KB cache.

256 KB cache memory option three basic logic elements:

  • 256 KB of SRAM
  • 4 KB of TAG SRAM
  • Cache Controller

256 KB of Static Random Access Memory ("Data SRAM"). This is two-way set associative, which allows each index location in the cache to store two pieces of information. This improves the hit ratio, and decreases the number of times that cache items must be removed to make room for new items.

4 KB of "TAG SRAM" stores some of the cache item's address bits, used to store and locate the item, and some bits used for validity checking.

"Cache Controller" coordinates access to the SRAM. On a cache-hit, the controller organizes the access of the data from the data SRAM using the TAG SRAM address. On a cache-miss, the controller places the new data into the cache, updating the TAG SRAM and data SRAM at the correct index location.

The controller is also responsible for ensuring that the address being searched for is actually a cacheable address. If not, no cache search will be done.

The L2 cache is controlled through the Cache Control Register (E2h), and its status is indicated in the Cache Status Register (E3h).

Optional Cache Card Installation

Plug the 256 KB cache onto the receptacle on the complex. One pin, called the "key", has been removed to provide a guide for inserting the card correctly.

256K Cache Not Visible under System programs?

After installing the 256 KB cache, the processor will simply begin to use the cache. It will not appear in the configuration of the system. The only time you will see the L2 Cache in a message is when it is malfunctioning.


256K 17 ns Cache Daughtercard P/N 6451095 or 64F0199

The PS/55 Type 1 complex uses a different 17 ns cache module (79F1293).

64F0199 Front [P]

U1-4 TC55329J-17 32Kx9 SRAM
U5,6,8 SN74ACT2160-17FM 8Kx4 TAG
U10 64F6043 PAL
U11 84F8257 PAL
U12 64F6065 PAL
U13 84F8261 PAL
U14 64F6046 PAL
U15 64F6048 PAL
U16 84F7970 PAL
U17 64F6066 PAL

U5,6,8 SN74ACT2160-17FM 8Kx4 2-Way Cache Address Comparator/Data RAM (databook pp 170)

Note: The chips change from module to module. Yours may be different. The cache controller is implemented using PAL/GALs (AMD chips).

64F0199 Back [P]

J1 159-pin connector AMP 650754-1
TD1 Fil-Mag 77Z14A030 30 ns delay line
TD2,4 Fil-Mag 77Z14A025 25 ns delay line
TD5,6 Fil-Mag 77Z14A045 45 ns delay line
U18-21 IDT 74FCT646ASO
U22,23 74AS573
U24-27 Toshiba TC55329J-17

U18-21 IDT 74FCT646ASO Fast CMOS Octal Transceiver/Register (Bitsavers pages 417-422)

TD? Fil-Mag or Sprague 77Z14Annn Active TTL Delay Module
   Equivalent to bel S423-00nn Active TTL Delay Module


256K 15 ns Cache Daughtercard P/N 92F0050 or 10G3527

92F0050 Front [P] (thx to Lorenzo Mollicone)

U1-4 MCM6205NJ15 32Kx9 SRAM
U5,6,8 SN74ACT2160-17FM 8Kx4 TAG RAM
U9 91F9757? PAL
U10 91F9775? PAL
U11 10G3532 PAL
U12 91F9783 PAL
U13 ? PAL
U14 91F9780 PAL
U15 91F9785 PAL
U16 91F9784 PAL
U17 91F9781 PAL

92F0050 Back [P] (thx to Lorenzo Mollicone)

J1 159-pin connector AMP 650754-1
TD1 Bel S423-0025-02 25 ns delay line
U18 MC88915FN55 PLL
U19-22 IDT 74FCT646ASO
U23,24 74AS573
U25-28 MCM6205NJ15 32Kx9 SRAM

U18 MC88915FN55 Low Skew CMOS PLL Clock Driver 55 MHz

Significant change from 17 ns version. The 64F0199 uses five Delay Modules and the 15 ns uses just one.


How Does System Know That L2 Cache is Installed?

Some of the pins on the L2 connector are most likely used as "presence detect" lines (i.e. floating high by default and tied low when the module is installed). This allows the firmware and system configuration/diagnostics software to detect the cache module and possibly to distinguish between the different types as well. The state of these lines can be read back through I/O port E2h - "Cache Status Register" (bits 4 and 5).

The complex/daughtercard doesn't have a POS ID (only the planar and adapters have one), so the US5530887A patent doesn't apply here.


L2 Cache Performance

From Us, the god-Emperor of Microchannel:
   Praytell, what use can one make of the 256K cache for the T1 complexes? I hate to admit it, but I never noticed a large (or significant) boost when I added one.

From Tony Ingenoso:
   The effects of modern bloatware on a write-through can be disheartening... IMO IBM's matched cycle scheme goes a long way towards helping keep the L1 lines filled at a brisk pace even when no L2 is present. The T2's abnormally good performance (considering its other genetic limitations) shows this well. For all practical purposes, 90/95's have a 64 bit memory subsystem working to fill the L1 lines.

From Charles Lasitter:
   What do you see with one speed processors (DX50) that are coupled with a faster cache 64F0050, or the T3 and integrated cache? Since they don't have a 'fall back' processing speed in the event of an L1 miss, but rather use a 15 ns L2 vs 17 ns, is there any difference for them?
   I believe we've seen LARGE increases in speed when doing something like kernel rebuilds compared to no cache. I think it may depend on what you're doing and the operating system.

From Tony:
   I don't see this as a core multiplier issue -- even the low end DX25 T2 runs better than one might expect it to. The kernel rebuild improvements aren't surprising - compilation algorithms and the bits of data they work tend to be well localized if modules aren't too massive. Initial parsing would be very read intensive as well and should make good use of an L2. Cache performance is indeed a very task specific kind of thing. Scattered code/data can effectively neutralize it totally.

DX50's are strange -- they often outrun DX2-66 when main memory bandwidth or I/O is the constraint. When staying in L1, then the DX2-66 wins due to the multiplier. With a fast L2 and fairly scattered code/data a DX50 is going to do very well.

From Peter:
   Uhmmm... I had the occasion to test a T1 DX2-33/66 board under Linux. And compare it with the same T1 DX-50 (!) board - both with the L2 cache.

The 486DX2-33/66 showed 33 BogoMips, the DX50 25 only... same as the T3 DX50 while a DX2-50/100 (Intel DX4-100 in 2x mode) on a T3-platform runs at -supposed- 50 Bogomips almost.

In the practical use the T1 DX50 wasn't much slower than the T1 DX2 - the XF86 stuff paced at the same rate on both. None of the machines "felt" faster or slower. The DX4 T3 was a bit faster - but not significantly. All 3 machines had the same XGA-2 card, the same TR 16/4 network adapter, the same 32MB Parity RAM and the same IBM 400MB HD with the Linux on it.

The T1 platforms had the "plug on" 256K L2 cache (17 ns on DX2, 15 ns on DX50) and the T3 had its own integrated cache. I did not write down all the values... maybe I should repeat that session again to get some definite, comparable data.


ODP vs. ODPR

169-pin ODP - 487SX installed with 486SX still in place, needs the "SX-disable" pin. Important on boards with soldered CPU.

168-pin ODPR - (R - "Replace") replaces 486SX / 486DX does not need "SX-disable" pin.


System Firmware (POST & BIOS)

Simplified firmware stored in EPROM (except for the Upg-66 complex that uses Flash memory). IML image required for the system to operate.

ROM Images

All ROMs are 27C010 or compatible (position U36 or U44).

64F4474 - 24 Apr 1990, rev. 0, Type 1 "J" with Weitek socket
84F9154 - 18 Jun 1990, rev. 0, Type 1 with Weitek socket or "SOD" solder pads
84F9155 - Unknown date and rev., Type 1 "J" or "K" with Weitek socket
91F9812 - 09 Jan 1991, rev. 1, Type 1 without Weitek socket, non-SOD
52G9509 - 03 Mar 1992, rev. 3, "Dual Booting Capability EPROM"

Support for >1 GB Disks as IML Drive

Type 1 complexes require the combination of BIOS 52G9509 and SCSI BIOS 92F2244/45 in order to handle IML drives >1GB (new limit is 3.94GB). The upgrade BIOS incorporates the "Enhanced IML" which supports IML from a drive >1GB and "Search IML" which allows IML from a drive other than ID6. The SCSI BIOS 44/45 pair supports drives well over 8GB. (Ed. You OS may have other ideas...)

More information HERE.

Some Other Thoughts

From Charles Lasitter:
   I've had some VERY entertaining results in my installations, depending on what other drives were present, and which version of the processor BIOS was used.

With the 52G9509 in place, ID6 in bottom bay (Mod 95) at end of cable, ID5 in bay above on next spot on cable, I couldn't get the IML to go to ID6 to save my ass. It made a beeline for ID5 every time. Put in the old BIOS, and it goes straight for ID6.

Enhanced BIOS Effects

From Charles Lasitter:
   As a result of a programming project with Mr. Clarke, I am now fairly certain that the odd behavior of an IBM SCSI controller "ignoring" ID6 to lay an IML track on a drive that was ID5 was really a function of the enhanced BIOS, which sniffs out the signature of any current or previous IML partition on a series of drives, and insists upon installing or recovering a system partition to that same location.

This same feature is related to the IBM controller's inability to do an actual format of the drive if there has been an IML partition on the drive before. The space at the end of the drive is never released, because the IBM controller refuses for format that area of the drive.

That's why I typically use the RAID adapter when I REALLY want to nuke some drives.

Upgrade EPROM Additional Capabilities

  1. More efficient use of Adapter ROM memory minimizes adapter configuration conflicts.
  2. BIOS support for IML drives up to 3.94 gigabytes per device.
  3. Supports "Search IML" from any PUN or SCSI ID. System partition is no longer restricted to SCSI ID=6. Each HD ID is searched for valid system partition.
  4. Allows redundant system partitions (IML).
  5. Sharing of SCSI devices. An external SCSI device, (ex. 3511), may be shared between two system units.

Type 1 complexes (except DX2-66 Upgrade, 92F0145) need BIOS 52G9509 to handle IML drives of >1,023MB. (U36 in drawing)

Complex EPROM Speeds

Most T1 complex boards come with a 120 or 150 ns EPROM, but the actual ROM read cycle is going to be even slower than that. So, since the timing is fixed (forced wait-states), replacing the ROM with a faster chip will not affect how long the Stage 1 POST takes to execute. Using a significantly slower EPROM may however cause trouble (read errors).

The Stage 2 POST code is loaded from the IML drive to RAM, verified, and then executed for RAM. The hard-drive speed is pretty much irrelevant here since the entire IML image is loaded at once and is only 128 KB in size.

Am27C010 versus Am28F010

I was diddling about, looking to turn out some 52G5909 T1 Upgrade BIOS for Lorenzo. In my desire to be lazy, I thought getting some EEPROMs would make my life easier, no UV eraser needed, just "Blank Device". So I pumped out five 28F010, and it is great! Blank 'em and program, no UV eraser needed... and then I ran into "Stuck bit Hell". I struggled through 20 28F010 in order to get ten good EEPROMs. I then sent my love children to Lorenzo, thinking, "Hey, they verified and have the same checksum, must be good". But I was wrong.

Lorenzo said:
   Swapped BIOS chip, video never goes live. Tried two chips, both don't seem to initialize.

So, experience suggests that you stay with the same device family or hilarity may ensue... I can't explain in detail why, but I sure as heck can say it didn't work for me. YMMD

Ed. The pinouts are compatible (the only difference is pin 31 - marked as PGM# in case of Am27C010 and as WE# for Am27F010).

Ed. Tom: When programming flash chips it's important to select not only the correct family but also the correct manufacturer and the exact device type.

Type 1 Complex Upgrade to "8590/95 Dual Booting Capability EPROM"

Complexes with the following EPROM part numbers may be upgraded:

Processor FRU P/N Model EPROM P/N Loc.
20 MHz SX 92F0049 0GX 91F9812 U36
25 MHz DX 64F0201 0JX 84F9154 or 91F9812 U36
33 MHz DX 64F0198 0KX 84F9154 or 91F9812 U36
50 MHz DX 92F0048 P3 (UPGD) 91F9812 U44

It was called the "8590/95 Dual Booting Capability EPROM Package".

Part number 52G9509 (was 52G9750 - try this if other P/N is not known)

Note: Use the latest refdisk and diags. See above...


Data Buffers (source)

The T1 processor complex has three data buffers. Two of these are connected to the two memory banks on the planar, and one is connected to the Micro Channel bus.

The main purpose of these buffers is to ensure that the processor receives its data on the correct lines. For example, the processor expects 32 bits of data. If a device on the Micro Channel sends 8 bits, the data buffer will make sure the bits arrive on the data lines that the processor will be expecting.

The data buffers attached to the planar memory have an additional function. They allow 64 bits of data to be held at a time. This allows the processor to access the first 32 bits of data, and then very quickly access the second 32 bits, without refilling the buffers. This ability speeds up access to memory, and improves system performance.

The MCA and memory buffers are implemented using the same type of device. There are however two different part numbers are associated with the Data Buffer ASIC - 54F2958 (older?) and 78F1659 (newer?). It's currently unknown what the difference is between the two (if any).


CR1 Diagnostic LED (unpopulated)

You can see this on a number of Type 1 complexes, including the Upgrade 486DX2-66 and the Upgrade 486DX-50. What is CR1 for?

Lorenzo populated the position with a LED and:
   No blinks, no on-off. Solid glow.

Tom says:
   Judging by its convenient location right in the corner, it was probably supposed to be a diagnostic LED.

Tom later on:
   Turns out that you can control the LED (if you populate it first) by toggling bit 1 of port E2h (0: LED off, 1: LED on). I don't think the bit controls anything else on the complex. Pretty sure it's just a debug LED, similar to CR1/2 on the T4 platform. It was probably used during the development, and then dropped from the production boards. The shipped firmware doesn't use it in any way it seems.

Content created and/or collected by:
Louis Ohland, Peter Wendt, David Beem, William Walsh, Tatsuo Sunagawa, Jim Shorney, Tim Clarke, Kevin Bowling, Tomáš Slavotínek, and many others.

Ardent Tool of Capitalism - MAD Edition! is maintained by Tomáš Slavotínek.
Last update: 26 Sep 2022 - Changelog | Legal Info & Contact